Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
From: Wilber Jeffcoat <jeffcoatphoto@sumter.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:40:18 -0400
References: <69.971978d.26d1d484@aol.com> <39A0CF34.D7B5543C@webshuttle.ch>

Bull Shit!
Wilber

Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Pop Photography and other magazines of its ilk have a very simple equipment
> testing methodology: whichever manufacturer happens to be the biggest
> advertiser during the period of testing wins the test.
>
> Nathan
>
> ARTHURWG@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Not my tests, tests I've read. Mostly Popular Photography. BTW, I think I
> > remember that Leni Reifenstal used an R to good advantage for her Africa
> > stuff.  Arthur
>
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
>
> e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
>
> General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
> Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
> Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))
In reply to: Message from ARTHURWG@aol.com (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))