Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M4-2
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:11:15 -0500
References: <7f.7d085e8.26b6e6d9@aol.com> <39859524.219F9CED@cyberhighway.net>

CORRECTION: IT DID HAVE A HOT SHOE............

Bill Satterfield wrote:

> y Leica book states the M4 went out of production in 1975. It then came out with
> the M4-2 in 1977 to meet the continuing demand of pro photogs. It was a modified
> version of the old M4 with out a hot shoe or self timer. It could be used with a
> motor drive.
>
> When they are on Ebay, they seem to bring a lower price than regular M4s. I have
> read comments that allude to more prone to mechanical  problems. Same for the
> M4-P.
>
> CapsTeeth@aol.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 7/31/00 8:08:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > mimesis@btinternet.com writes:
> >
> > << Can anyone tell me why the M4-2 is often reviled? I've just had a chance to
> >  take my recentlyCLA'd M4-2 out and I love it - I much prefer to my M6. The
> >  shutter release is so much more positive and need so little travel. With a
> >  softie it is perfect. The M6 feels slacker for some reason. OTO at least I
> >  could get a backup fairly cheaply!
> >
> >  Julian >>
> >
> > I had an M4-2 for many years and it functioned as any other M.  My M4 and M2
> > feel even smoother in operation, but the function is the same.  Eyes closed I
> > couldn't feel any mechanical workings difference between M4-2 and M6.  All
> > told, I prefer M6, because of the meter.

In reply to: Message from CapsTeeth@aol.com (Re: [Leica] M4-2)
Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> (Re: [Leica] M4-2)