Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan: This may be true but it didn't help me. 6x7cm and 4x5 inches didn't produce any better results for me. It has to be in the eye of the phootgrapher and it just isn't in mine. Ken Wilcox At 7:49 -0400 7/22/0, a fine scholar, Dan Cardish wrote: >I think landscape photography benefits from larger film sizes. > >Dan C. > >At 06:53 AM 22-07-00 -0400, you wrote: >>Robert: >> >>I share your affliction. In all the years I've been doing photography >>(about 40) I've taken exactly ONE decent landscape shot. Not that I haven't >>tried! I've wasted more film on this activity than I'd like to admit. >> >>People shots also seem to be my forte. I can usually get nice activity and >>portraits with little thought and using just about any equipment. Go figure. >> >>Ken Wilcox - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com> <kwilcox@gfn.org>