Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] optical excellence and the human error factor
From: "Marthe.Rene" <marthe.rene@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:58:13 -0400
References: <01BFEFD1.E522A700@user-2ive0jr.dialup.mindspring.com>

Hi Austin, its now obvious you are trolling. So have fun. You are now alone
on the lake.

Rene

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] optical excellence and the human error factor


> > W.R.T. to EV being used for Autofocus detection capability they are and
I
> > quote from the owner's manual.
>
> > F5 - "Autofocus detection range EV-1 to +19"
> >         " Metering range EV0 to 20 in 3D colour Matrix, EV2 to 20 in
> spot"
>
> > EOS 1V " AF working range EV0 to 18"
> >                " Metering range EV0-20 for all metering  modes"
>
> That's all well and good, but these are numbers that for optimal
conditions
> for the particular system the manufacturer has deployed.  The actual real
> world range of the autofocus system can vary considerably from the numbers
> you (they) quote, depending on scene conditions.  Metering is completely
> different, and is far more accurate to characterize and give a spec for.
>
> If you want to discuss this further, perhaps you ought spend some time
> learning how the different systems work, and what their shortcomings are.
>  I have used many autofocus (and autoexposure) systems, and I have found
> shortcomings of every one in real world situations.  If you understand how
> the particular one you are using works, you can then understand how best
to
> use it, and avoid possible situations that will cause that system to fail.
>
>

In reply to: Message from Austin Franklin <austin@darkroom.com> (RE: [Leica] optical excellence and the human error factor)