Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Again I trust this allows you the understanding of why some use both and > sometimes prefer one over the other, with no thought of which we use as > long as we have them to use. Thank you (all) very much for all the info. I do understand why you, and many others use the Leica R camera. My needs are quite different though...I am a commercial photographer, and use Hasselblads for all my work. I am very very glad I bought my M6, and the bevy of lenses that I 'needed' ;-) Recently, with the advent of reasonably priced digital scanners and printers, and the lack of good MF digital scanners with reasonable price/performance, I decided to buy an M6, for its small size, ease of use and mostly for scanning. And because of the Leica glass ;-) I am head butting the small negative size and grain issues though... The R doesn't solve that problem, obviously, if I can't get the results I want with my M6. I am trying a few different things to see if I can improve on this issue. I like a winder (the M motorized winder is too big for my likes, so I use the RapidWinder, and love it), and if I did get a motor it doesn't need to be fast (or rewind the film), and I wouldn't mind a spot meter (I really don't like the meter in the M6, but I can use it effectively now that I know how to). One deterrent is the M lenses don't work on the R, so really any other SLR would do (ie, new Contax) since I would have to buy a whole new system. Perhaps my best option is to wait a bit and see if I can get the results I want with my M. If not, then I am probably best spending the big bucks and getting a good MF scanner...but then, I'm back to the bulk of my Hasselblad... Something in-between would be nice ;-)