Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Spragens" <t.spragens@cityweb.de> To: "Leica Users digest" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 4:57 AM Subject: [Leica] Re: Slightly OT:Artixscan 1100 > > From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> > > > > At 9:54 PM -0400 7/14/00, Isaac Crawford wrote: > > > I've been thinking about getting into the digital end of things > > > for a while... > > > > > >Isaac > > > > ... the LS2000. It is > > particulary in getting information out of the densest areas of a film > > that the LS2000 has an advantage. The Polaroid 4000 has higher > > resolution, but the Nikon does better in getting into the shadows, and > > only the $5000+ flatbeds even start to approach either one of these as > > far as the dynamic range is concerned. Actually, the Artixscan 1100 has a *published* DR of 3.9... That's kinda what I was going after... This particular scanner is one of those dual reflective/transmission scanners, kinda like the Agfa duoscan. That's why I was comparing it to the Nikon... Isaac >