Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: UV filter
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:03:40 -0700
References: <200007132227.PAA04873@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>

You noticed that I didn't include the "Scotch" discussions...  :-)

Jim


At 05:30 PM 7/14/00 +0100, Tim Spragens wrote:
>Gee, Jim. If all those things were gone, what would be left on the 
>list, scotch?
>
>> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:14:05 -0700
>> From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
>> Subject: [Leica] Re:  Re: UV filter
>> 
>> It's OK to discuss, and repeat, and repeat, and repeat, ad nauseam,
>> really stupid, nothing to do with Leica "photography" on the LUG.
>> Like:
>> 
>> "PC's vs MAC,"
>> "The slow horrible death of Leica,"
>> "The Noctilux and toy cameras,"
>> "The Machiavellian LUG,"
>> "Thanks!! OT Nikon F5,"
>> "Thanks!! OT Contax G2: Cost,"
>> "Leica bashing,"
>> "That ain't no customer, that's....,"
>> "Leica vs. Contax wars,"
>> "Leica R8 brick (millstone?),"
>> "Leica Pornographers of the world Unite!,"
>> "leica pimples?," 
>> "it DOESN'T work well for leica!,"
>> "pointless debate about speaker cable,"
>> "Charlton Heston,"
>> 
>> and, of course, the list goes on forever...
>
>
>--
>Tim Spragens
>http://www.borderless-photos.com