Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>Quality control and customer service both cost money. Money spent on those items comes off of the bottom line...a bottom line that Herr Cohn is being paid to raise...not lower. >>Quality control is 'always cheaper' when it is done by the consumer. >This seems to have offended some of our fellow Lugnuts, but that doesn > 't stop his observation being true - quality control costs, and good > quality-control is expensive. These are incredibly naive, and entirely short sited statements. Anyone who knows how to (or anything about how to) run a successful business knows it does NOT cost more, overall, to do good quality control. Especially on an item that has VERY limited market, and is VERY expensive. It costs more to have mad customers (calling customer service all the time) and for Leica to have to have cameras sent back in for repair, repair them, and then to have them sent back to the customer. It is only software (ie, Microsoft) that can get away with this kind of crap, and this will change soon. Though Microsoft does not make a very quality product, their customer service IS top rate. They are responsive, polite, and informed. Also, you do not have to send your software back to fix a problem...