Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Point No.1 I have no opinion about; either you are or you are not entitled to take photographs in subway stations. Look it up in a law book. As far as part 2: goes, I have no problem with this, especially the part about protecting the dignity of "victims of crime". Dan C. At 09:06 AM 08-07-00 -0700, you wrote: >Who let the nuts out of the asylum? I both encountered and read about >dimwits who tried and are attempting to prevent picture shooting on grossly >absurd bases recently: > >1) I went to the opening of the new subway in L.A. recently with my M6 and >21 mm ASPH and a male Metropolitan Transit Authority rep rushed up to me and >insisted I stop taking photos. I asked why and he said, "This is private >property and no picture taking is allowed". I corrected him by stating >"federal (our tax) dollars paid for this system and, therefore, public >access and photo taking are assured privileges". He said, "No, we built >this, this is our property, and we have the right to state what can and >cannot take place on our property. Photo shooting is not allowed". I told >him to get lost. Then I saw him approach a photographer from a local >newspaper and overhead him telling her the same crap. Dimwit! > >2) "Laws before the French Parliament dictate that photographers could not >take pictures of criminal suspects wearing handcuffs, or of crime scenes >where a victim's dignity is jeopardised. The measures form part of a broader >bill to boost the rights of criminal suspects and victims of crime..." > >These manifestations of suppression are tacky and are probably not the last >we will see arise, and I'm certainly not eager to see what occurs next. What >an absurd era we live in! > >Terry > > >