Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] OT: (kind of) Voightlander 90mm?
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:21:54 -0400

Just how superior was the M body to the Hexar, and superior how- in what
ways?

Thanks..
B. D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Craig
> Roberts
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10:09 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: (kind of) Voightlander 90mm?
>
>
> Michael asked: "Anyone on the LUG have any insider info on whether or not
> Voightlander WILL be releasing an LTM 90mm in the near future?"
>
>
> I haven't a clue, but it prompts a question of my own.
>
> Given that M-lenses allegedly work with the Konica Hexar RF body...has
> anyone tried the Konica 90mm f2.8 (or the 28mm f2.8)? on an M body?
>
> The June issue of the UK's "Practical Photography" magazine features a
> "shootout" among the M6, the Konica Hexar RF and the Voigtlander Bessa-R.
> The Leica body was superior, of course, but...according to the
> reviewer...the lenses were amazingly similar.
>
> Craig
> Boston
>
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: (kind of) Voightlander 90mm?)
Reply from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: (kind of) Voightlander 90mm?)