Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:11:12 -0400
References: <4.2.2.20000629183453.00bc67d0@infoave.net>

At 04:22 PM 6/29/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Tina,
>
>Bob said it in different words than I did when you where away recently. My
>contention is that women see cameras, lenses and accessories strictly as
>tools to achieve an end result whereas, while  men also use them as tools,
>some also see them as jewels, toys and objects to be venerated as well.
>
>What do you think, especially based on the fact that LUG is always mired in
>equipment talk and only "occasionally" we come up with gems?
>
>Joe

Hi, Joe -

Well, I've always heard that the only difference between men and boys is 
the cost of their toys.  I guess that means that all of the male LUGnuts 
are real men!

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com

Replies: Reply from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally,why are there so few women on the LUG? Seemsa sham e.)
In reply to: Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)