Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Trip Report - Fog
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:31:23 -0400
References: <002201bfe058$d083b6a0$1916a318@triad.rr.com>

Hi, JB -

Yes, I eliminated that because some of the rolls in the 6 roll tank were 
fine and others were fogged.  It occurred on reels in different positions 
in the tank, too, with subsequent loads of film.  I think it has to be that 
the film I stored in Honduras was affected some way that only fogged the 
last few frames.

Tina


At 10:50 AM 6/27/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Re Tina's fog.
>
>Fact that it was all Tmax points to a development problem, IMHO. I have
>noticed processing differences between the tail and leader of a film due to
>one being on the outside of the can and the other in the centre. In my case
>the results were due to under-agitation of the part of the film in the
>centre and over-agitation of the part of the film on the outside. Could
>fogging be insufficient fixation due to under-agitation of the relevant part
>of the film? Tmax is a hog for fix, and this would explain the difference
>between the Tmax and the Tri-X. You've probably thought of this and
>eliminated it, I know.
>
>JB

Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com

In reply to: Message from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Trip Report - Fog)