Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]another alternative is to send the paper a bill for the one time use of your copyrighted photograph. Stephen Andrew Moore wrote: > > So, a local newspaper has reproduced one of my photos, without > > permission. It could be that the parents passed the print I sold to > > them for a minimal fee to the editor. I'm going to have a little fun > > and explore this. > > Keeping track of your photos and enforcing the usage rights is > very difficult in this situation (i.e., when you provide a photo to > a party that passes it on to the media as a "courtesy" photo). > I shot a photo for a local band last year knowing that it would > be submitted to a local paper that was doing an article on the > band, and I specifically requested that a photo credit appear > with it. Of course it ran without credit. > > Recently, the same paper wanted to run one of my photos that > I shot for a local theatre group, and this time I knew better: > I spoke with the arts/entertainment editor on the phone and > politely told her that the photo could not be used without > credit. Keep in mine that this was another free job. It ran > again with no credit. > > To make a long story short, it took many phone calls and > I had to work my way up the the executive editor to actually > get any sort of response from someone who wasn't implying > that the error was mine. Absolutely unbelievable! And I > never even got so much as an apology from the person who > made the mistake. To their credit they did run the photo > the following week with proper credit. > > I won't be submitting any more of my work to that paper > until they (proactively) come to me and assure me that the > mistake won't happen a third time (it's a measure of how > badly they do or do not want my work). It's unfortunate > not only for me and the paper, but for the local artists and > theatre group that still want (and can use) publicity from > time to time. > > If I ignored the problem it would give the wrong message > about photographers and the value of their work. > > I've been continuing to freelance for their competition > ever since. They may not pay much (who does?) but they > don't seem to disrespect their photogs. > > At the very least you might want to mark the backs of > your photos with a "do not reproduce without permission" > and a copyright clause, and a contact number. > > --Andrew > NO ARCHIVE