Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Deals we shouldn't oughta have made
From: "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:20:21 -0700
References: <200006240456.VAA18654@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3954FC96.7B49@bellatlantic.net> <395500CB.36CF@wenet.net>

> > Or the 135mm f2.8 I was asked to buy, and I did not want as I had
the
> > 90mm f2.0 (still have it), so to get rid of the guy I said "I will
give
> > you $35.00 for it" I still have that lens too.........we will never
see
> > those days again.....   wBill
>
> Hi Bill,
>
>      Bought in '68:  Leica IIIa w/Summar f/2, $45 from big store.
>
>      Bought in '79:  M3 w/Elmar 2.8, $450, same store.
>
>      I know, inflation, etc.  But it seems harder to come up with the
> dough for today's Leica prices.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rich Lahrson
> tripspud@wenet.net

Well, rest easy that M6 with Summicron didn't cost $45,000 in 1999...

In reply to: Message from Bill Barton <wbill@bellatlantic.net> (Re: [Leica] Deals we shouldn't oughta have made)
Message from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@wenet.net> (Re: [Leica] Deals we shouldn't oughta have made)