Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Michael Darnton wrote: > > Yes, I completely agree with the prevailing idea that the M4-2 and M4-P are > trash cameras, [snip] > More seriously, I think it's interesting that the -2 and -P are always > looked down on because of their cost-cutting "cheap" covering, flare-prone > finders, and lack of a self-timer, but no one thinks to criticize the > various M-6 versions for the same thing [snip] I don't think the -2 and -P are such great bargains for shooters anymore: What I've seen in the past few years have been battered and overpriced examples. On the other hand, the M6 "classic" seems to be a genuine bargain right now. Even if you don't like the M6's metering, you have to admit that it's film reminder dial is a whole lot nicer ;-) Jeff Segawa no archive