Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Build Quality of Lenses
From: Doug Cooper <visigoth@echonyc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:37:30 -0400 (EDT)

Okay, I've now spent a couple of days with a DR Summicron (thanks to
Ting!), and I have a few thoughts.  While I've never been impressed by the
argument that holds the M3, M2 and M4 to be superior mechanically to the
later bodies -- I've worked with both types, and my M4-P is just as nice,
in every way -- I am now utterly convinced of the the superior build
quality of the early lenses.  Later, horrendously expensive Leica lenses,
though reasonably well-constructed, feel about as solid as my old Zuikos,
and less solid than the fully metal lenses for the Contax SLR.  Frankly,
the new black Voigtlanders feel better (although I'm less happy with the
finish on the chrome versions).

This DR Summicron, on the other hand, is about as well made as
anything I've ever held in my hands.  It's a joy.  I'm determined, now, to
buy only the earlier lenses, unless the optical performance of the
recent versions are vastly superior.  Call it a fetish thing.

So.  I'm still searching for that perfect 35mm lens.  How is that old
chrome Summicron, relative to the fourth generation?  And what about the
35/2.8 Summaron?


Doug Cooper

(oh, and thanks for the response re:  my IIIc.)

Replies: Reply from Damian Dlugolecki <damian@teleport.com> (Re: [Leica] Build Quality of Lenses)
Reply from Laurence Gadd <lgadd@northriverpress.com> (Re: [Leica] Build Quality of Lenses)