Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>>>>>>> As Kyle noted, it's nice to see something different. But is it art? Probably not if the artist has to ask? Is it pornography? Doesn't that depend upon the eye/mind of the beholder? Is it shocking? Not in the year 2000? <<<<<<<<< The word pornography seems to get a lot of use here for pretty harmless things. To my mind, porn is gaping insertion closeups and the like (yumm). For profit. Nudes and so on, even Berube's pics, not. Even kyle's tame picture of a girl waving her arms got called porn by the artiste himself. Now you gotta ask yersel', kid, - did I say yumm seriously? As for the year 2000 - slavery of all kinds at a historic high, genocide flourishing, blah blah blah. I think they put one too many 0's on it. So I can phone Attilla the stokebroker on my cellphone from the peak of K2 - big deal. Someone please tell me about video capture cards or I'll go on like this all night! Please! Rob. Like the man said: art ain't dead - it just smells funny. Robert Appleby and Sue Darlow Via Bellentani 36 41100 Modena Italy Tel/fax [39] 059 303436