Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG Photo Critique
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:31:11 +0200
References: <B56C5FF9.4B1E%howard.390@osu.edu>

Martin,

It does sound interesting, and if you do it I will participate.

Cheers,

Nathan

Martin Howard wrote:

> Not at all.  I could volunteer to keep a page up that has the photo of the
> month to be critiqued posted on it.  People can then point their browser to
> that URL (I'd post a message in the LUG when a new photo was put up there)
> and write their comments to the LUG, perhaps using "Photo Critique:" as the
> start of a subject line.
>
> The tricky bit is the photos. I can see two scenarios:
>
>   a) Lots of people submit pictures to be critiqued.  How do you select
>      which one to put up?
>
>   b) Very few people submit pictures to be critiqued.
>
> Actually, (a) isn't much of a problem.  First come, first served.  I'd
> simply keep the JPEGs on file and put them in in the order I receive them.
>
> Hmm, this is actually beginning to sound like something that's taking form.
> Is anyone interested in this?
>
> M.
>
> --
> Martin Howard                     |
> Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU       |     "Life imitates email."
> email: howard.390@osu.edu         |                -- Johnny Deadman
> www: http://mvhoward.i.am/        +---------------------------------------

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium and Zurich, Switzerland
e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator
Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman

Replies: Reply from john <bosjohn@mediaone.net> (Re: [Leica] LUG Photo Critique)
In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> ([Leica] LUG Photo Critique)