Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If we are talking about the latest version of the Elmarit, it weighs 410 grams vs 500 for the F2 AA. I traded the Elmarit in on the Summicron AA, and don't notice much difference in size/weight. Some time ago, I sold a chrome Summicron (the original with the removable head). That was a heavy, large lens. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Satterfield [SMTP:cwsat@cyberhighway.net] > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 10:32 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Was: Tell Me About This Lens Now: TE versus > new elmarit > > > I like the TE becuase of it's size and weight. The 2 is heavy and big. The > TE > is a good walking around lens and the 2 is not. The 2 is not being used > and I > thought if I got the latest 2.8, I would have two good lens to use.Any > reason > to keep the 2? > > Dan Cardish wrote: > > > Why keep the TE if you are getting the newer 2.8. Or vice versa? > > > > Dan C. > > > > At 08:20 AM 12-06-00 -0500, Bill Satterfield wrote: > > >I have the 90/2.8 TE as well as the 90/2 non- asph. I was thinking > about > > >selling the 2 and getting the latest 2.8 and keep the TE. Any thoughts > on > > what > > >I should do? > > > > > >drodgers@nextlink.com wrote: > > >