Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yeah, I agree, Bud. Those early bayonet R hoods were great, especially the one for the 50mm Summilux that would reverse on the lens for storage, thus avoiding getting lost. In fact, the hood I have for the Noctilux (hood #12539, if I recall) bayonets on in similar fashion, but it had no provision for bayonetting (sp?) in reverse position for storage (for what reason I cannot imagine---just an oversight perhaps?). However I was able to cut reverse notches in the inside rim of the hood that now allow it to do that. Art Peterson -----Original Message----- From: Bud Cook [mailto:budcook@attglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 11:20 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston The 12575 fits the 90 Elmar, the 90 Elmarit, the 135 Hector and the 135 Tele-Elmar. It reverses over the lens and has plastic cap. The 12585 fits the f/3.5, f/2.8 and f/2.0 35mm lenses as well as the 50 Elmar and Summicron lenses. It will hold a 39mm filter and will reverse over the Rigid Summicron. The hoods that I find to be really nice are the cast aluminum hoods that bayonet to the early R lenses, especially the ones with the built-in polarizer rotation. Bud ----- Original Message ----- From: <Jlaird@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:15 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston > In a message dated 06/07/2000 11:14:35 AM Central Daylight Time, > Sonnar502@aol.com writes: > > > Two caveats: I absolutely despise that ridiculous "condom" hood too. In my > > limited experience with Leica stuff, it's ranks as a joke! While I'm not > > fond of the pull-out ones either, at least they'll take *some* bump - > unlike > > > > this goofey rubber thingy. Makes me nervous.... #2: a regular E39 filter > > no-worko too well with the threads on outer ring of the hood. Is this > > normal? or is the ring torqued a bit? Jim, anyone? any ideas? It > irritates > > > > me on those occasions when I want a green or yellow filter..... > > > > I've heard the 12585 hood will fit the 'skinny' 90 2.8, as well as the 50mm 2 > and the 35 2. Not sure myself because I made the grave mistake of selling my > 90 2.8 back in the seventies when I was poor...should have gotten another job > instead! I didn't like the 'condom' hood either, although I did on occasion > bump the lens into stuff and it protected the front element pretty well. > > Jim > > Jim >