Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sounds like one of my two favorite lenses, the "Skinny" Tele-Elmarit (my other favorite is the pre-aspheric 35 Summicron). The Skinny T-E is a much maligned lens, but in my opinion and experience it is wonderful. Small, light in weight (which are among the main reasons I lug Leicas), and quite sharp enough for all but the most hideously critical photographers. I prefer to carry lenses which slip into a pocket as I abhor gadget bags and tote the minimum kit. There have been some reports of fungus on the rear elements of these lenses which is a terminal disease. However, a recent LUG survey (check the archives) revealed that the fungus was not epidemic, at least among subscribers. A lens that has been fungus free since...oh...1986 should remain so. Some people consider the Skinny T-E to be "flarey." I don't. I also prefer lenses with the old clip-on lens shades which will break away when slammed into a wall and absorb the blow. These shades will also not collapse on their own and are generally deeper and, in my opinion, more effective than the stupid pull-out shades which Leica should abandon. To quote Charlton Heston-- something I never thought I would do-- they can have my Skinny Tele-Elmarit when, "they pry it from my cold, dead fingers!" Buzz Hausner - -----Original Message----- From: Johnny Deadman [mailto:deadman@jukebox.demon.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 8:32 PM To: Leica Users digest Subject: [Leica] tell me about this lens Tele-Elmarit 90/2.8 that I just picked up for not much. Made in Canada, no. 3378280, glass as clear as a bell. Hood looks like a condom, but tiny and very very light. Had to be a bargain at the price I paid, but what should I know? - -- Johnny Deadman photos: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com music: http://www.jukebox.demon.co.uk