Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kodachrome
From: chucko@siteconnect.com (Chuck Albertson)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 10:39:44 -0700
References: <l03130304b55bdd704fe3@[203.87.44.98]> <4.3.1.0.20000601123425.00bdb430@mail.peterwhitecycles.com>
 
K64 was manufactured in 120 format for a few years in the late 1980s, early
1990s, but was then discontinued. Presume it was due to lack of demand,
which in turn was probably attributable to processing hassles at the time
(slow turn-around times, quality control problems with the Kodak's
let's-outsource-our-processing experiment).

Chuck Albertson
Seattle, Wash.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Jon White" <PeterJonWhite@PeterWhiteCycles.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kodachrome


> At 09:09 AM 6/1/00 -0700, you wrote:
> But if you want to use
> >Kodachrome, you MUST use a 35mm camera.
> >Jim
>
> Any idea why KII is only made in 35mm?
>
>
> Peter Jon White
>
>
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Kodachrome)
 In reply to: Message from Alastair Firkin <firkin@netconnect.com.au> ([Leica] Kodachrome)
Message from Peter Jon White <PeterJonWhite@PeterWhiteCycles.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Kodachrome)