Re: [Leica] Re: Steve LeHuray

["Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com>]

Steve

You are indeed notable for your incredible smallness of mind.  Please feel
free to enlighten me, and I presume many others on this list, and share with
us all the many posts that I have made with amateurish questions, for which
I make no excuse as I am indeed an amateur.  One day I hope to aspire to the
lofty heights of professionalism and self esteem that you have risen to,
only I hope I will be more than the pea brained "idiot" that you seem to be.


Amateur images at http://www.phoenixdb.co.uk/leica


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Steve LeHuray <icommag@toad.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: 26 May 2000 22:40
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Steve LeHuray


>
> > At 07:19 AM 5/26/00 -0700, Steve LeHuray wrote:
> >>Simon,
> >>Hate to say this but your "idiotic" questions are becoming tiresome and
I
> >>wonder what the need you have to chirp in with so many pointless one
> >>sentence replys. Please save the bandwith. But then you seem to have so
many
> >>questions it actually may benefit you to go out and buy a Leica book or
two.
> >>Steve
> >>Annapolis
> >
> > Hey!
> >
> > That was TOTALLY uncalled for. Simon is a pretty damn good photographer,
> > "amateur" or not he helped me out with some info on Scala that I was
> > interested in. His posts are always something related to Leica whether a
> > question or a bit of advice.
> >
> > It was my impression of this group that it exists for that purpose...for
> > folks to share knowledge and ideas on photography as it relates to the
> > Leica experience. If those folks who are still learning (all of us I
> > presume) are boring you, shove off and start a Leica Expert List where
you
> > do nothing but impress each other (if you can find someone else who
knows
> > as much as you) with what you already know.
> >
> > Yes as I read the LUG in digest form, I too would prefer folks to edit
> > their replies and to save up several comments for fewer postings, but I
> > submit that if you were interested in 'saving bandwidth' and not in just
> > being rude, you should have posted your comments privately.
> >
> > Carpe Lumen,
> > Michael E. Berube
> > http://www.goodphotos.com
> >
>
> Carpe/Michael, or whomever,
> In case anybody did not notice, which I can understand considering the
high
> volume of meaningless posts Simon has made, the "idiot" word that I used
are
> in quotes which is his own word. Now he may be a "pretty damn good
> photographer" but considering how he seems to spend most of his time on
the
> LUG asking amateurish questions........well I wonder. And as far as
bandwith
> when I see a string of 20 posts from Simon (and some others) that are one
or
> two sentences with some cutsie remark (several included the word "idiot"
> referring to himself) about one of his previous posts, it becomes to much.
> There is only so much time in the day and.......oh forget it.
> Steve
> Annapolis
>
>
>