Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 90 Summicron-M Comparisons
From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:02:49 -0700
References: <v04011702b553bb57cef7@[209.53.32.31]> <000701bfc6ba$37bb4620$52206420@kimmel>

At 6:37 AM -0400 5/26/00, Dan Cardish wrote:
>Have you found this from experience, or is this just an assumption based on
>the "APO" designation?  I'm asking this because the wording used in the
>English Leica Cataloge used to describe the 90 AA isn't the same as that
>used to describe all of the R-series APO lenses, ("apochromatic corection
>for extended spectral range" for the R lenses).
>
>Dan C.
>
>At 10:38 PM 25-05-00 -0700, Henning J. Wulff wrote:
>[snip]
>>
>>Also, for IR
>>use, the new 90 does not have to be refocussed. This makes IR shooting with
>>a 90 a true pleasure.

Experience with HIE, which has the greatest sensitivity into the IR region
of any readily available film. It should be noted though that since HIE is
a very coarse film, slight optical deficiencies will not be as noticeable
as with a finer grained film. In any case, the 90 A-A makes IR photography
a great deal easier.

   *            Henning J. Wulff
  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
 /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
 |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 90 Summicron-M Comparisons)
Message from "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net> ([Leica] 90 Summicron-M Comparisons)