Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Noctilux vs 50mm f/2
From: Peter Jon White <PeterJonWhite@PeterWhiteCycles.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 08:49:05 -0400
References: <200005260952.e4Q9qtG00369@helme.stelvio.nl>
 
Because you may not always WANT a 50 gallon drum hanging off the front of 
your M4. ;-)

At 10:58 AM 5/26/00 +0100, you wrote:

>I have been told that if I purchase a Noctilux I should keep my 50mm f/2 as
>the Noctilux should be regarded as an additional lens rather than a
>replacement.  Can anyone tell me the possible rationale behind this point of
>view and whether you agree with it or not?


Peter Jon White
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Noctilux vs 50mm f/2)
 In reply to: Message from Arne Helme <Arne.Helme@stelvio.nl> (RE: [Leica] Dirty finder)