Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thoughtI would ask this as a general question although I did raise the issue in a reply to another message. I have been told that if I purchase a Noctilux I should keep my 50mm f/2 as the Noctilux should be regarded as an additional lens rather than a replacement. Can anyone tell me the possible rationale behind this point of view and whether you agree with it or not? Thanks. Simon Amateur efforts at http://www.phoenixdb.co.uk/leica