Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:27:33 -0700
References: <002a01bfc683$8b152f20$590110ac@505HE3203331.ccapr.com> <392D9685.946C3F33@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
 
WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years.
Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address.
Thank you.  stephen@earthlink.net

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative


> "B. D. Colen" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > A very DARK one I suspect . . .
> > >
> > > Bob (if I can't see it, I don't shoot it) McEowen
> >
> > ....for which there undoubtedly many very greatful men, women, children
and
> > cows!
>
> What about those shots when you're reloading?
>
> "There ARE no shots when i am reloading!
> I. Forgot Who
>
In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)