Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:26:00 -0700
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell> <4.2.2.20000525172932.00ab7c20@infoave.net>

WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years.
Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address.
Thank you.  stephen@earthlink.net

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Manley" <images@InfoAve.Net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 2:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative


> At 10:05 PM 5/25/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >Just out of interest, is the metering on an M6 accurate at such low light
> >levels?
>
>
> It is pretty accurate!  The newer M6's have more accurate metering in low
> light than the older ones.  For an available darkness photo with the the
> Noctilux wide open and 1600 film pushed to 3200 see:
>
> http://main.nc.us/openstudio/tinamanley/Honduras/amilcar.htm
>
> Leically,
>
> Tina
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)