Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years. Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address. Thank you. stephen@earthlink.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative > Tina > > Wow! That image really shows the power of the Noctilux. At what shutter > speed was it taken? > > Simon > > Amateur images at http://www.phoenixdb.co.uk/leica > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: 25 May 2000 22:45 > Subject: RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative > > > > > > At 10:05 PM 5/25/00 +0100, you wrote: > > >Just out of interest, is the metering on an M6 accurate at such low light > > >levels? > > > > > > It is pretty accurate! The newer M6's have more accurate metering in low > > light than the older ones. For an available darkness photo with the the > > Noctilux wide open and 1600 film pushed to 3200 see: > > > > http://main.nc.us/openstudio/tinamanley/Honduras/amilcar.htm > > > > Leically, > > > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP > > http://www.tinamanley.com > > > >