Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: [Leica] Re: Leitz vs. Voigtländer
From: "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:24:01 -0700
References: <392D256B.13175CB1@french-rogers.com> <3.0.2.32.20000526060750.00ff08ac@pacific.net.sg>

WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years.
Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address.
Thank you.  stephen@earthlink.net

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "D Khong" <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leitz vs. Voigtländer


> >At 9:06 AM -0400 5/25/0, Kurt Miska wrote:
> >> The
> >>price difference is, of course, staggering. A new 35/2 Summicron (black)
> >>runs $2445 vs. $479 for a new Ultron. That's over five times as much,
> >>based on Tamarkin's website.
> >>
> >
> >$2445 for a 35 Summicron? That can't be correct. I recently bought one
new
> >in LTM chrome for less than $1700.
> >
> >Ken Wilcox
> >
>
> It's one of those List Price vs MAP differences I suppose.
>
> The best value is still getting a used 35 cron with good glass. Chances
are
> you won't lose much even if you sold it later.
>
> Dan K.
>
>
>
>
>
>

In reply to: Message from Kurt Miska <k.miska@french-rogers.com> ([Leica] Leitz vs. Voigtländer)
Message from D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg> (Re: [Leica] Re: Leitz vs. Voigtländer)