Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 16:23:14 -0700
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell><4.2.2.20000525172932.00ab7c20@infoave.net> <4.2.2.20000525181406.00ac4d70@infoave.net>
 
WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years.
Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address.
Thank you.  stephen@earthlink.net

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Manley" <images@InfoAve.Net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative


> At 11:06 PM 5/25/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >Tina
> >
> >Wow!  That image really shows the power of the Noctilux.  At what shutter
> >speed was it taken?
> >
> >Simon
>
>
> Simon -
>
> I don't take notes but I think I was using a monopod for this photo and I
> would guess 1/30 or 1/15.  It was really dark.
>
> Tina
>
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
>
In reply to: Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)