Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Steve, From my perspective using the soft release, as opposed to without, is better due to the way i hold the camera, and it gives me more mass to trigger the shutter. In this respect i can squeeze off shots, rather than push/pull, which often leads to camera shake for me. Others are possibly going to say similar things, but i really do get a couple of extra speeds without the shake using the softy. If it comes down to 1/30, i'll get the shot no problem now, before i might get lucky. I too am highly caffeinated usually. Sadly, i also think it is one of those things you have to try for yourself, and maybe it won't do anything for you, or it inconveniences your shooting style, which will make it really unattractive. If you do shoot at low light levels with any frequency--get one, it's quite easily the best, not just Leica, but photographic investments i've made. All the best, Gary At 10:26 AM -0700 24/5/2000, Steve wrote: >Bob, >That is a great week 07 photo. And, being a heavy coffee drinker myself >(there is a new study out that heavy caffiene users are not likely to get >Parkinson's Disease) I have always wondered about the benefits of a soft >release, so, maybe somebody can explain it to me because I do not see how >the shutter release on a Leica could be any softer. >Steve >Annapolis - -- "The difficulty now is that unexceptional adults believe the loss of youthful dreaming is itself "growing up," as though adulthood were the passive conclusion to a doomed activity and hope during adolescence." OO The Uses of Disorder [_]<| Personal Identity and City Life -- Richard Sennett /|\ Gary Elshaw Post-Grad Film Student Victoria University New Zealand http://elshaw.tripod.com/ http://elshaw.tripod.com/photointro.html