Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The price difference would probably not be great enough to justify it. - -- On Tue, 23 May 2000 16:29:22 Bmceowen wrote: > >In a message dated 5/23/00 2:02:30 PM, ohlen@sierratel.com writes: > >>In 1968, the recommended price for the M4 was US$216 (DM855) which shows a >1999 price of $1048. The Summilux 1:1.4 for the M4 and M2 was $154 (DM616) >which would show a 1999 price of $747>> > >Let's see, the M2 was 71 percent of the cost of an M4. Now if Leica could >produce a camera that was 71 percent of the price of a Classic M6 they might >sell a few . . . > >Bob (where's today's M2?) McEowen > Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com