Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Thanks!! OT Contax G2: Cost
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 14:41:49 -0400

Rubbish....pure rubbish.  It's this sort of crap I hear on the LUG which
makes me want to chuck all of my Leica gear and stick with my real cameras.
   I don't want to be associated with the elitist crap.


Dan C.

At 07:13 AM 23-05-00 -1100, Takeshi Hashimoto wrote:
> 
>--
>
>On Tue, 23 May 2000 12:32:17   Dan Cardish wrote:
>>I've missed the beginnging of this thread, but reasonable compared with
what?    
>
>For what they provide: The best lenses on the planet.
>Compared to say, Mark Levinson or other high-end electronics or other
high-end audio gear, where the $10,000 phono cartridge can be found.
>Compared to say, a top racing bicycle.
>say: http://www.bianchi.it/Eng/Start.html
>A set of magnesium hubcaps ($1000)
>Top-of-the line adidas soccer shoes ($180)
>
>
>If you're just comparing standard build quailty and features, my
>>M6 cost me about $1,000 more than my Minolta 9, but doesn't come close in
>>terms of build quality, or included features (regardless of whether or not
>>you want them).    Maybe the Leica's optics are better, but so what?  If
>>you like using Leicas, then you will  use them, just as I do.  The wealthy
>>will simply buy them, the rest of us will somehow scrape up the money.  But
>>there is nothing reasonable about them.  
>>
>>Dan C.
>>
>> At 05:03 AM 23-05-00 -1100, Takeshi Hashimoto wrote:
>>> Nonesense. Do you know what the cost of doing busines in Germany is? In
>>1971, an M4 cost $500. They're actually cheaper now, factoring in
>>inflation. Leica prices today are VERY reasonable.
>>
>>
>
>
>Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
>Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com
>
>

Replies: Reply from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] Thanks!! OT Contax G2: Cost)