Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Thanks!! OT Contax G2: Cost
From: "Takeshi Hashimoto" <hashimoto.takeshi@mailcity.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 06:04:51 -1100

 
- --

On Mon, 22 May 2000 08:49:27   John Collier wrote:
>You will be delighted to learn that the word "cost" does not have to be
>confined to a strictly monetary definition. The space allotted and the
>patience of the average leica-user forbears a detailed discussion. Perhaps
>we could take this off list and amaze one another with a new nuance of
>meaning and usage of this oh so useful word every day. We probably could
>occupy ourselves thus for several weeks.
>
>Cheers
>
>John Collier ;-)

What I meant was that all things being equal (which they're not) if cost were to be the deciding factor, the difference was negligible. If, as you point out, the M6 could not be used efficiently because of poor eyesight, then that's something else again. It's not cost.

>> From: "Takeshi Hashimoto" <hashimoto.takeshi@mailcity.com>
>> 
>> What does this have to do with "cost".
>
>


Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Thanks!! OT Contax G2: Cost)