Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I tried to add PJ stuff to my weddings in the '70s, but I found there just wasn't enough time for one person to do it all. I had my hands full just rounding up all the usual suspects and getting them properly posed. It didn't pay anyway - I figure that out of 24 album prints, 16 or so would be formal poses, 6 would be casual poses and maybe a couple would be PJ candids. You can cut out the PJ shooting and no-one notices. Blow a Mexican Execution of the grandparents and you get threats of lawsuits... (obLeica) I swore 15 years ago that the next wedding I shot would not be with an M6, it would be with an M16. So far no-one's asked me >:-) Paul Chefurka >-----Original Message----- >From: Robinsnes@aol.com [mailto:Robinsnes@aol.com] >Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 2:26 PM >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] The wedding photographer rag > > >Interesting, that is my view of PJ-style. If I have to do it, >I hire another >pro to shoot along with me as a PJ while I do the posed. >Couples usually >choose the posed for their albums. > >Roger Skully >robinsnestphotography.com >