Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simonn lamb chose to use the followingg exaple in favour of autofous Take Schumacher spinning off in the British F1 Grand Prix last year. If you did not happen to have been tracking him with your inbuilt human AF capabilities, by the time you had heard the tyres screech, turned round, pointed, focussed and taken the shot he would have been in the helicopter on his way to hospital! I bet many Canon EOS and Nikon F photographers got some good shots of that action, far more than the number of manual focus photographers old have done. This is exactly the opposite of what the pros in F1 believe. Maybe the F5 does not do this, most in F1 use Canon, but the examples given to me as to why the top F1 pros use MF on the circuit is that when something unexpected happens and they suddenly swing from where they were concentrating to the new action by the time the AF spot is over the action and the camera has re-focussed it is all over. AF can easily give a shot nicely focussed on the gravel trap or barrier with a blurred racing car somewhere in frame. A slightly out of focus shot is preferable in these circumstances. The good guys know what they are trying to achieve and are prepared to risk having a smaller number of brilliant keepers rather than complete films of totally in focus banal images. I must admit that I do not do on circuit shots because I am working in the pits, this is (possibly out of date) opinion I have been given by the best pros. I have an EOS 1n and know how quickly it can focus onto the wrong thing if the subject you are interested in is not in the appropriate sensor positon. Cheers Frank