Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>The limitation is with the negative and the information in it, right? If the >enlarger lens cannot "read" the details in the negative because of >underexposure >or severe overexposure can a scanner do better? Poor technique is poor >technique unless you completely bypass the negative and shoot on some >medium that >can hold 30 zones of information. > >Ray > > That pretty well sums it up. You still have to make good negatives digital or wet darkroom. As far as that wide range film I suggest Ilford XP2 (or the Kodak as second choice). It scans better than anything I've tried. And it has almost 30 stops of range. Give or take 18 or 20 stops. :) Henry Ambrose