Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi LUGers: Here's the scoop. As discussed before in this forum, I am a new Leica afficionado that has been amazed at the quality of the transparencies shot with an M6 TTL, 35 f/2 Asph, and 90 f/2.8 Elmarit in terms of color saturation, contrast, and detail. Of course, rangefinder photography has its limitations (macro, telephoto etc.), so I do not want to abandon SLR photography. Over the years, I have assembled a pretty decent collection of N***n SLR equipment. However, the quality of transparencies being produced by the Leica M setup has me wondering if Leica R equipment would be equally impressive. Is it worth selling the Nikon equipment and beginning to assemble a Leica R kit, especially given the outrageous prices of many R lenses or are the quality of N***n pro lenses pretty darn close to Leica R lenses? I would appreciate some practical advice, especially given the fact that I am off to NYC for a long weekend to attend a high school reunion and plan on visiting Leica House, Tamarkin, etc. Thanks, Mitch Halpern Menlo Park, CA