Re: [Leica] Tri-X rated at 200ASA with an M2

[Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>]

I listed all the details. What is it you want to know?

Bill Satterfield wrote:

> I shoot Tri X at 200 and develop it at HC 110, 1 to 32 ounces for 4 and  a half
> minutes. GREAT CONTRAST.......
>
> Dan Honemann wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > Can you give details on this combination, please?
> >
> > Interested,
> > Dan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Michael
> > > Darnton
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 7:40 PM
> > > To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-X rated at 200ASA with an M2
> > >
> > >
> > >      I did used to believe that until I took a workshop with
> > > David Vestal.
> > > His negs were THICK and his prints were great, too. He's the one
> > > I learned
> > > Tri-X at EI 250 in D-23 from, which is the magic combination I
> > > find myself
> > > repeatedly coming back to. There's nothing quite like shadow detail!
> > >      --Michael Darnton
> > >
> > > >>From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
> > > But a 35mm neg requires the minimum density to get the image.  In other
> > > words no more exposure or development than needed for adequate detail. Or
> > > grain builds up and you get a mushier negative to make a less
> > > well separated
> > > print.
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> > >