Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Excellent point....Nor, I guess, would someone looking at two photos side by side, of different subjects, comment on the sharpness of the lenses they were shot with, rather than on the photos themselves, UNLESS one lens was a coke bottle bottom...and MTF graphs aside, that doesn't seem to be the case with the Cosinas. I know it's certainly not the case with the Nokton, which produces terrific results... - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jeff Spirer Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 12:30 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm At 08:38 AM 4/7/00 +0200, Hans Pahlen wrote: >Dominique, >Thanks for the numbers. Now I understand your point. What still puzzles me >is that Chasseur d'Images came to this radically different conclusion >about the Cosina 25. >I will shoot my sample wide open and at F/8 during the weekend and compare. Why? Will it change your photographs? Make them better or worse. Some people may want to have a gallery show filled with MTF charts for their lenses, but I would bet that no-one would visit. Jeff Spirer Photos: http://www.spirer.com One People: http://www.onepeople.com/