Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Now, let's see. There is an eight hour time difference between Denver and Solms. So if I stay up until 1:00am that will be 9:00am in Solms. I think I am going to call Herr Cohn first thing in the morning and ask him if Leica really has a marketing department? Why do I ask? Well, wait until you get a look at the May issue of Shutterbug magazine. One quick look through that issue and you will agree with me that the Leica marketing department must only exist in the minds of the most gullable. Let's take a quick tour of the May issue: The cover has a great photo of a Voigtlander Bessa-R (no Leica) On page 8, half of the "editor's Note" column is devoted to the Nikon S3 along with a great photo. (no Leica) Moving right along, we come to page 50 where Roger W. Hicks has a good article on the renaissance of rangefinders. There is a big color picture of the Bessa-R, a big color picture of the Konica HAXAR, and a big color picture of the Hasselblad XPAN. (Here again no Leica) The text on page 50 does mention Leica, but not in very flattering terms. The article continues on page 52. Here there is a black and white picutre of a 1950s Voigtlander, a black and white picture of an M2, and a black and white picture of a Russian Zorki 4K. Moving on to page 54. Wow there is another picture of a Leica... so what if it an antique model 250, at least it is a picture. Below it are two pictures of Russian FED cameras. Now wait, I'm not finished. Beginning of page 138 there is a multi page article on the PMA show in Las Vegas. On page 154 of that article, there is a nice color photo of the Bessa-R and a nice color photo of the Konica HEXAR. (no Leica). Moving ahead to page 158 there is a nice color photo of the Contax G2. There is also a paragraph about the G2 and a paragraph about the Konica HEXAR lenses. (no Leica). Checking page 210 I find a long paragraph about Voigtlander's new lenses and a picutre of same. (no Leica) Now, way the hell in the back of the magazine, page 240, there is a black and white picture of what I think is a point and shoot C-1. However, there is no text on that page about any leica product, nor is that picture identified. Ok, let's take a minute to put all of this in perspective. Imagine if you will that this is not a leading (if not the leading) photography magazine, but rather a computer magazine. And, the product not given the proper notice was Microsoft Windows 2000. Or, let's say that the products under review are film rather than rangefinder cameras. What do you think would happen if KODAK did not get proper exposure? Ok, how about an article about S.U.V.s (four wheel drive cars) where Jeeps were not adequately covered. You know what would happen as well as I do. All hell would have broken loose in those companies, and heads would roll...as well they should. Like I have said before, I come out of an environment where corporate executives are paid to "MAKE thing happen". Herr Cohn may well be able to keep cranking out 'contrived collectables', in the spirit of P. T. Barnum, and turn a profit doing so. Mean while the potential for a once great camera company to be reborn slowly slips away. Regards, Bill __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com