Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] apo 90 versus 4/150
From: Dennis Painter <dpainter@bigfoot.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:09:59 -0800

Michael Darnton wrote:
> 
>   I understand Mike's posting perfectly. "Scientists" have reduced my field
> (violinmaking) to a bunch of result-free drivel with their wishful thinking.
> MTF might very well be a useful concept, but to reduce the whole of the
> qualities of a lens to one single parameter strikes me as, well, absurd
> minimalism. Simplification of concepts to numbers appeals greatly to
> scientific types, and is certainly a useful strategy for developing
> products, but in the acoustics field, at least, I've noticed that the
> science types like to zero in on the things they can measure as being the
> important things, and snub the things they can't measure as being
> unimportant (classical sour grapes, in case you missed my connection). In
> the main, it hasn't fooled violinists, however, and it doesn't sound like
> the approach fools every photographer, either.
>   --Michael Darnton
> 

Michael,

Thanks for the reality check!

Dennis