Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a question. I have not been able to find the perfect bag type method of carry as a traveler sight seeing. I prefer a backpack since a camera bag carried on one shoulder restricts my arm movement. I do not like the front open designs preferring a top open. A conventional day pack seems to work for me but it lacks padding. MY QUESTION: Does anyone sell fabric covered foam approximately one-half inch thick in varying widths and lengths that could be used for lining the internal perimeter of the pack and creating divisions? BTW, I believe a daypack will attract less attention of thieves. Roland Smith roland@dnai.com - ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Appleby and Susan Darlow <laintal@tin.it> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 3:29 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Camera Bag Recommendation > >> > Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 18:16:50 +1100 > From: "Rick Dykstra" <rdandcb@cybermac.com.au> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Camera Bag Recommendation > > This Domke F803 and Billinghom Alice shoot-out/discussion is useful. > > Could I invite users of these bags to describe what they can carry, for M > and R systems. And how they feel about the protection offered and > convenience of use. I'd want to carry two M bodies, four lenses, an SF20 > flash and a few rolls of film. > > I'm currently using a Leica Universal Bag, and its a nice bag, but I like > the idea of a satchel style bag, for its body hugging centre of gravity. > > Thanks > > Rick (would have a ball with two bags) Dykstra > >> > > I used the Billingham Alice over the last year as my carry-around bag. It's > a great bag. The large front pocket is especially useful, carries around > ten rolls of film and other small items. The main body I used to carry one > R body with lens, a single extra lens and a small hotshoe flash unit. > Anything more would be too much, I think. If you don't use flash much, it > would just take two R bodies back to back with lenses (short lenses!). My > only gripe with the bag is that it's too rigid; for instance, it won't > adapt to the shape of a body with motordrive. However it's extremely well > made and nice to carry around. I'd recommend changing the strap (surgery!) > for an Optech bag strap; much better grip and comfort. The Alice is > definitely my favourite bag. Just a shame I left it with a friend in Bombay! > I also have a Photo Hadley which has more capacity but is a bit too deep > for my taste. I _had_ one of their larger bags, but it was no good for > working out of - bad access to the central body and too many fiddly > closures. I got rid of it. > I don't think I'd recommend any of the Billinghams for working out of if > you need to change lenses frequently and want to carry all your gear > around. But if your camera lives on your shoulder and you have just film > and maybe an extra lens in the bag, either of these two is great. That's > just my style of working - I hate carryng loads of stuff around. If it > wasn't for the fact of needing to carry film and a flash, I'd never carry a > bag. > One thing about Billingham which may justify their high prices is that > their bags are genuinely weather proof and last for ever. I used the Alice > throughout the monsoon last year and never had any problem with it. The > Hadley has an even better flap design. > Bags - can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em. There's something > mighty necessary about them! > Rob. > Robert Appleby > V Bellentani 36 > 41100 MO > Italy > > Tel: 0039 059 303436 > >