Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]john wrote: > > C. E. Workman Jr. wrote: > > > > >2967633 is one of mine, but I don't see 3201247, that is my other one both > > >of which have pecular dotted fog on the back of the front element. > > John Shick > > > > Sorry, John. The second lens I listed was a typo. It should have been > > 32014XX. That's your lens. I've got to put my fat fingers on a diet! Were > > your lenses Canadian or German? > > > > Chuck > Both Canadian, one of which was the 1913-1983 commerative. > John Shick BTW I just took the 29676xx out yesterday for some shooting. I used HP5+ and developed it in Ilfosol-s 1-9. The neg. look sharp and contrasty under a 10x lupe, but I don't have a new Elmarit 90 or Simmicron 90 with which to compare. The neg. look fine and printable, so I think I will use the lens anyway. John Shick