Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:47:12 -0000, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us wrote: > Jeff- Ignore Buzz's advice and go with a 35 if you are only going to get one > lens. And, if you can afford it, go with the 35 Summilux ASPH, which may > just be the single best lens in the Leica M line. > > 35 is a great focal length - just long enough to function as a "normal" > lens, and just wide enough to allow you to get in close and still get a > reasonable view of the environment surrounding your subject. > > If you can't spring for the Summilux ASPH, or don't need the extra stop, go > for a 35 Summicron. The ASPH is said to be great, but, at the same time, the > last version of the non-ASPH Summicron is still a really terrific lens. > > B. D. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Buzz > Hausner > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 3:32 PM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] Almost Ready to Take the Plunge. > > > Jeff-- > > You are about to get a deluge of opinions and I would wager that the > majority will say that you cannot live without an aspheric 35, probably the > Summilux. You can buy what the majority of us tell you to buy, but my > advice would be to try both (putting aside for the moment any question of > lens speed) and see which focal length works for you. Do you have previous > experience with these focal lengths? I would guess that your preferences > developed using a 35 and a 50 on an auto-whatever camera will still obtain. > If not, if I were you, I would consider determining what I can spend and > divide that amount between an entry level 50 and 35-- and there are plenty > of fine and less expensive Leica lenses out there-- and work with them for a > while. Then YOU can decide which is THE lens and give advice to others > after you trade both at very little lost value for the latest and greatest > 50 or 35. > > Buzz Hausner > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Bailey [mailto:sasxjb@excite.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 10:00 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Almost Ready to Take the Plunge. > > > Hi All, > > Well, I have decided that I must have a manual camera and I have decided on > a Leica M. This will be my first exposure to a range finder camera. > > I think that I should start with one lense (minimize the number of variables > to start). I want your opinions on THE lense. I was thinking of either a > 35mm or 50mm. > > Thanks, > Jeff > > fish-boy@mindspring.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite > Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp > Hi, I plan to get more than one lense. I just want some opinions of which to start with. I would love to have the 35 Summilux ASPH! The focal lengths I eventually plan to acquire are (21 or 28), 35, 50 and 90. This will be done over time. Thanks, Jeff fish-boy@mindspring.com _______________________________________________________ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp