Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nick, I traded the former for the latter. The asph is sharper when shooting wide open, and does not seem to be as prone to flare when shooting into a light source (like the sun). If you do most of your shooting at medium apertures, and don't often shoot contre jour, the last non-asph may be a better bargain. Depends on what you want to do with it. Chuck Albertson Seattle, Wash. > Basic question: > Can anyone tell me the difference in image quality in practical shooting between new 2/35 asph and latest non-asph 2/35. I want to buy > either, is it worth to spend extra money for asph, is it that different? > Thank you. Nick P. >