Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:47 AM 3/9/2000 -0500, timswan wrote: >Excuse me. I was mistaken -- I thought that the Voightlander lenses were >based on Zeiss designs. The rest of my post stands. Having used the >Cosina lenses after first doing extensive research I find them to be >excellent. > No, they were NOT based on Zeiss designs. The Zeiss Foundation bought Voigtlander from the Schering drug company a half-century back in part to acquire the excellent lens-design facility and personnel Voigtlander had in Braunschweig. And, when the Foundation merged Voigtlander into Zeiss Ikon a decade later, the lens folks went to Oberkochen and stayed there, as Zeiss employees. That is how highly Zeiss esteemed the Voigtlander lens designs. I am not suggesting that the Cosina lenses are not decent lenses. I am saying that there is absolutely no connection, other than the name, with the Prominent lens designs and the like. The Cosina "Heliar" is NOT a Heliar-type lens, and will not perform as does a true Heliar. It might perform BETTER than a century-old Heliar, but it is still not a Heliar. We have been over this before on the LUG ad nauseam, and I am not trying to beat this dead horse any further, as the issue is minor. My only reason for raising it now is that a poster suggested that the Prominent lenses must be excellent, as he had heard the Cosina lenses were excellent -- and that is simply a non sequitur, there being no connexion betwixt them other than the name. Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!