Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Point to ponder: When we talk about the degrees in between an 'f stop', normally, older camera books talked about 1/3 increments. This is because the increase of exposure is logrithmic in most sensitometric situations. If you have a given amount of light entering a lens/camera, doubling it gives a logrithmic increase of exposure of .3; If you double it again, the logrithmic value of the overall increase is .6, and doubling it again, a value of .9. Since common logrithms are based on 10, an exposure increase of .9 means an overall increase of 8 time the original exposure ( 2X2=4, 2X4=8) if you go to a log increase of 1.0 from .9, then the exposure is ten times the original-( 10 to the first power is 1, 10 to the second power is 10!) By determining the log increase of light with each increment of aperture diameter, it is relatively easy to caluclate the aperture needed to give exposure differences of log .1 Since there is a lot of 'slop' in the process of processing film- it is hard to be exact all the time, I would venture to say- and this is from my experience, that any increment smaller than 1/3 or even 1/2 of a stop is not going to be detectable unless you are in a lab or darkroom equipt with sensitometric instruments. I am sure Erwin might be able to enlighten us in that area. In testing lenses, I am sure that what we call 'falloff' in the corners, and edges of lenses is the cosine error introduced by a lens and if it is measurable, then I am sure that the log differences in the various 'f stops' could be measured, and tested against actual exposure on the film. Dan