Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, If you have specific details, I would appreciate them. I am specifically talking about the standard M6 NON-TTL metering system. The issues involved are not more complex than I can 'imagine'. If you have a component list, I'd even love to see that, or even a good photograph of the flex-circuits. It's hardly top secret, since one could just take a camera apart and make the list for them self, and even reverse engineer the schematic, unless they decided to re-mark the ICs. Even if they did that, it's still not that tough. I find it hard to believe a simple meter system was designed with any exotic single sourced or custom ICs (and if it was, it shouldn't have been). The meter system has four inputs, plus power. Shutter button depressed, shutter speed dial, film speed dial, and the light sensor. It's got two outputs, two LEDs. I assume the aperture is taken into account by the light sensor. It doesn't even have a low battery indicator. Depending on the characteristics of the sensor electronics, they may have done some temperature compensation circuitry...not rocket science. Austin >Austin, > I believe Peter was referring to me as the other party in his conversation. > It might not sound right to you, but the issues are more complex than you > imagine. German law requires spare parts and serviceability-over-time that > would be abnormal in the USA. IC manufacturers require significant volumes, > of which Leica are incapable. The inventory management processes used take > all this and much more into account. When a manufacturer, for whatever > reason, stops making money on a product (assuming they can detect that), > unless there are good reasons, they cease production. This is only > indirectly related to their customers' inventory of some of their purchased > IC's being retained as spare parts, and not being used in production. > I'd be happy to discuss this with you if you want more detail. > best of light, > Alistair - -----Original Message----- > He said that the reason for the TTL M6 wasn't so much TTL, but to > justify the larger body that was needed to fit the electronics from the R8. > He said that the electronics for the M6 meter were no longer available from > the manufacturer and Leitz had no option but to use the R8 electronics for > the meter. [Austin] I don't know that I believe that. How are they going to repair ALL the M6 non-TTL meters if they can't get any of the electronics? I doubt it is patented, and they certainly could just have someone else 'make' them, it isn't rocket science... If some component went EOL (end of life) there would more than likely be an available replacement. That juts doesn't sound correct to me. - ------------------------